Showing posts with label CES. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CES. Show all posts

Friday, January 27, 2012

This is Not a CES post, Not a CES Post

Originally posted on on Ravepubs, January 19th, 2012




 


This is not a post about CES, No, not at all.  But as you brought it up - just a few thoughts


CES is huge, I mean really huge.  You may think that Infocomm or CEDIA is large but neither one of these have left our dear friend Richard Fregosa curled up in tiny trembling ball on the plush carpet of the LG booth. Actually this did not happen, nor do I suspect Mr Fregrosa exhibits anyIMG00049
public displays of trembling- ever.  It is I who would suffer the ‘who put my knees on backwards today’ walk from canvasing the infinity that is CES.  And yes, I would wind up a puddle on the LG carpet, a booth babe nervously poking at me to see if I was still breathing. Just reading RF’s twitter posts and blog missives for CEPro have me holed up in the corner of my office with the first heat rash symptoms of a  trade show specific agoraphobia.  


When a show can be compared to the infinite universe you know for sure that it is just too damn big.  Watching the Twit.tv folks record iPad Today live walking around the ‘iLounge’ section of the show and twice realize that they had left the section only after someone pointed it out to them -just made me happy it was them not me.


You might argue that the show obviously needs to be as large as it is, just look at all the booths they filled and all the attendees. Phil Swann of TV Predictions.com summed up my feelings when he tweeted:



“@SwanniOnHD: Hard to believe the stuff u see on the #CES2012 floor; much should have been left on the cutting room floor”



Then there is the Gizmodo post by Mat Honan . Gizmodo lives and breaths this stuff so it is worth noting when he says:



“Then it's time for a meeting, so I scuttle out through a maze of ocular and aural assaults, past booth after booth of headset-wearing pitchmen doing their best Billy Mays. Deep in the middle of the din, I meet yet another PR person whom I'll never see again in my life, and settle in for a demo of another product I already know I'm not going to write about.”



With too much space to fill we find ourselves swallowed up in detritus and ephemera.


We, as a culture, are fervently fond our ability to spread out, to take up space. Our homes are a testament to this early pioneer spirit of owning our own spread.  It is also a testament to an entire economy which fuels innumerable bloated shows  full of stuff to fill our abodes with.


In my last post “Knit One, Purl Two”  I touched on the opportunities and advantages of going small - how compression can generate new and exciting ideas. Limitations are liberating, forcing new solutions and even revisiting older ones that we should not have abandoned, Like moderate homes with porches.


I own a fairly modest home, a 1901 colonial which, with the finished attic, is about 1900 square feet.  This is, in reality much too much space.  In reality I only use about half the space for actual living, the rest just accommodates stuff - mostly items I do not need and could be put to better use.  The house was purchased as it fit my other priorities of being near mass transit and within walking distance of a local deli/grocery store/ bara porch, this and the small patch of green in the back.  Given my druthers I would have preferred a smaller house on the same lot with less house  more grass and more porch.  So yes size does matter, just not how we have been taught.  


Recently my wife and I performed the annual post X-mas purge of toys, clothes and other miscellaneous items from the house. Each time we do this, (and we do it at least twice a year which is two times too few for me), I am appalled at the sheer volume of items we have accumulated which we have no real need for.  I think part of the issue is that we actually have the space to keep all this flotsam and jetsam. My parents, most likely subconsciously, purchase too many things for the kids because we can fit it. While anecdotal, when we lived in an apartment the items the grandparents brought in were far less and smaller.


I KNOW it will draw guffaws and hackles but  there is much to said for houses that concentrate on function rather than flash.  I am particularly fascinated with the work of Lugi Colani’s Rotor House concept design or perhaps something along the lines of Normal Projects Origami apartment.  The attraction here is beautiful design with emphasis on natural light and economy of space by creating multifunction without appearing industrial.  While the homes are in the vein of Frank Lloyd Wright's prairie homes these homes far more than ranch homes redux, the point is more environmental rather than ornamental.  


There is a larger social effect beyond taking up less space. In a time before ubiquitous air conditioning folks would spend a great deal of time on their porches and stoops - knowing their neighbors and keeping an eye the general welfare of the area. Even today, communities where people use their porches on a regular basis tend to have  lower crime rates.  These communities also generate less trash and are greener in general in particular, if not completely, because there is less space to accumulate random stuff. The trend may be bad for the folks from ‘American Pickers’ and CES exhibitors but not our industry.


In the cloud based future there is less need to have and store a physical medium, for example our playback and storage devices are small and mostly portable.  The trend is for more personal listening (headphones and headphone amps were everywhere at the show, every online magazine commented on just how pervasive the units were).  Even when a more traditional listening experience is desired the new compact speaker systems are comparable with their larger space hogging brethren -(taking into account economy of scales).   


This would, of course, mean a shift in just what and how home media and automation items are created and sold.  Homeowners will be more interested in controls and media delivery that lives and moves from personal device to the home and back again.  Interoperability, quick replacement transition and customization will be the hallmarks of a new mass market controls.


We may feel a bit pressured by this coming small world but the trends of global urbanization and explosion of multifunction products that incorporate a video monitor, storage, Internet connectivity and control in one box show an inevitable path.. This years CES dichotomy of too much floor space and compact offerings are the rune stones. But then again we were not talking about CES, were we?




 



Wednesday, January 25, 2012

This is Not a CES post, Not a CES Post

Originally posted on on Ravepubs, January 19th, 2012


 


This is not a post about CES, No, not at all.  But as you brought it up - just a few thoughts


CES is huge, I mean really huge.  You may think that Infocomm or CEDIA is large but neither one of these have left our dear friend Richard Fregosa curled up in tiny trembling ball on the plush carpet of the LG booth. Actually this did not happen, nor do I suspect Mr Fregrosa exhibits any IMG00049
public displays of trembling- ever.  It is I who would suffer the ‘who put my knees on backwards today’ walk from canvasing the infinity that is CES.  And yes, I would wind up a puddle on the LG carpet, a booth babe nervously poking at me to see if I was still breathing. Just reading RF’s twitter posts and blog missives for CEPro have me holed up in the corner of my office with the first heat rash symptoms of a  trade show specific agoraphobia.  


When a show can be compared to the infinite universe you know for sure that it is just too damn big.  Watching the Twit.tv folks record iPad Today live walking around the ‘iLounge’ section of the show and twice realize that they had left the section only after someone pointed it out to them -just made me happy it was them not me.


You might argue that the show obviously needs to be as large as it is, just look at all the booths they filled and all the attendees. Phil Swann of TV Predictions.com summed up my feelings when he tweeted:



“@SwanniOnHD: Hard to believe the stuff u see on the #CES2012 floor; much should have been left on the cutting room floor”





Then there is the Gizmodo post by Mat Honan . Gizmodo lives and breaths this stuff so it is worth noting when he says:

“Then it's time for a meeting, so I scuttle out through a maze of ocular and aural assaults, past booth after booth of headset-wearing pitchmen doing their best Billy Mays. Deep in the middle of the din, I meet yet another PR person whom I'll never see again in my life, and settle in for a demo of another product I already know I'm not going to write about.”



With too much space to fill we find ourselves swallowed up in detritus and ephemera.


We, as a culture, are fervently fond our ability to spread out, to take up space. Our homes are a testament to this early pioneer spirit of owning our own spread.  It is also a testament to an entire economy which fuels innumerable bloated shows  full of stuff to fill our abodes with.


In my last post “Knit One, Purl Two”  I touched on the opportunities and advantages of going small - how compression can generate new and exciting ideas. Limitations are liberating, forcing new solutions and even revisiting older ones that we should not have abandoned, Like moderate homes with porches.


I own a fairly modest home, a 1901 colonial which, with the finished attic, is about 1900 square feet.  This is, in reality much too much space.  In reality I only use about half the space for actual living, the rest just accommodates stuff - mostly items I do not need and could be put to better use.  The house was purchased as it fit my other priorities of being near mass transit and within walking distance of a local deli/grocery store/ bara porch, this and the small patch of green in the back.  Given my druthers I would have preferred a smaller house on the same lot with less house  more grass and more porch.  So yes size does matter, just not how we have been taught.  


Recently my wife and I performed the annual post X-mas purge of toys, clothes and other miscellaneous items from the house. Each time we do this, (and we do it at least twice a year which is two times too few for me), I am appalled at the sheer volume of items we have accumulated which we have no real need for.  I think part of the issue is that we actually have the space to keep all this flotsam and jetsam. My parents, most likely subconsciously, purchase too many things for the kids because we can fit it. While anecdotal, when we lived in an apartment the items the grandparents brought in were far less and smaller.


I KNOW it will draw guffaws and hackles but  there is much to said for houses that concentrate on function rather than flash.  I am particularly fascinated with the work of Lugi Colani’s Rotor House concept design or perhaps something along the lines of Normal Projects Origami apartment.  The attraction here is beautiful design with emphasis on natural light and economy of space by creating multifunction without appearing industrial.  While the homes are in the vein of Frank Lloyd Wright's prairie homes these homes far more than ranch homes redux, the point is more environmental rather than ornamental.  


There is a larger social effect beyond taking up less space. In a time before ubiquitous air conditioning folks would spend a great deal of time on their porches and stoops - knowing their neighbors and keeping an eye the general welfare of the area. Even today, communities where people use their porches on a regular basis tend to have  lower crime rates.  These communities also generate less trash and are greener in general in particular, if not completely, because there is less space to accumulate random stuff. The trend may be bad for the folks from ‘American Pickers’ and CES exhibitors but not our industry.


In the cloud based future there is less need to have and store a physical medium, for example our playback and storage devices are small and mostly portable.  The trend is for more personal listening (headphones and headphone amps were everywhere at the show, every online magazine commented on just how pervasive the units were).  Even when a more traditional listening experience is desired the new compact speaker systems are comparable with their larger space hogging brethren -(taking into account economy of scales).   


This would, of course, mean a shift in just what and how home media and automation items are created and sold.  Homeowners will be more interested in controls and media delivery that lives and moves from personal device to the home and back again.  Interoperability, quick replacement transition and customization will be the hallmarks of a new mass market controls.


We may feel a bit pressured by this coming small world but the trends of global urbanization and explosion of multifunction products that incorporate a video monitor, storage, Internet connectivity and control in one box show an inevitable path.. This years CES dichotomy of too much floor space and compact offerings are the rune stones. But then again we were not talking about CES, were we?


Wednesday, September 21, 2011

The Unspeakable Seems to Have A Voice

A few days ago I posted a provocative  post, entitled "I say a Dirty Word", on Gary Kayye's  RavePubs blog to the custom install professionals to embrace the DIY community as  best bet toward future growth. 


Well it seems that even the pro stalwart PRO Sound News has some similar thoughts by posting a series of videos from the NYC Makers Faire






 


You can see a bunch more videos from the show here


 



Thursday, January 27, 2011

Muybridge is So Cool He's Gotta Wear Shades

  Muybridge is So Cool; He's Gotta Wear Shades


3D TV and the Consumer Electronic Follies

 Technical buzzwords are such evocative things, love 'em or hate 'em, they help us to wrap our heads around complicated concepts and give the Marketers something to peddle to the masses and snake oil carpetbaggers a new label to misappropriate. 


When High-definition panels started to really take traction in the home market, HD became the buzzword that every manufacturer, tech magazine, and consumer electronics device had to include – regardless of the actual ability to do anything constructive with an HD signal. 


Many of you who, as I do, spend many undesired hours awake at 2 am will recall ads for HD vision glasses. The ad's line is- 'See in HD'! An associate who will remain anonymous to lessen his shame bought a pair and claimed that they work but give him a headache after a few hours. If the glasses were not enough, a few days ago, I heard an advertisement for a 3D-branded electric shaver; my head hurts thinking about that.


Speaking of Headaches and 3D.

 3D is everywhere, or at least the promise of it for the mass market is the talk of every AV magazine, blog, and Box Store' sales associate'. If you haven't heard the ceaseless din of 3D-ready devices and displays, I can presume you still use a TV that will change channels if an errant slinky is nearby. The last time I heard such over hype was when they announced the (never released) Brenda Starr movie.


The success of Avatar whipped up a frenzy amongst integrators and manufacturers in a down economy looking for any path that could generate revenue. From system upgrades and hardware sales to movie productions and disc sales, yes, indeed, 3D could just save the Earth from becoming an interstellar highway bypass. 






The Road To Nausea  

As a kid, I watched with religious fervor the WPIX broadcasts of the 1940s and 50's movies on Sunday afternoons. The station ran trailers between the Abbot and Costello features to fill in time. Invariably, at least one Vincent Price 3D trailer was shown. Watching these films in the theater must have made one feel like Marty Feldman on a hyperthyroidism bender; at least, that is how I felt upon leaving the theater after watching Avatar. 


Honestly, what other AV technology has the AMA warning against '…pregnant women, the elderly, and drunks…" from using 3D displays? Nintendo has put out a warning that children under six should not use the 3DS at all. Will theaters have to start stationing nurses outside or have patrons sign a release prior to viewing, just as producers for 'The Blob' did? Except this time, will it be for real?


Is this really the legacy of Muybridge's work and gentle afternoons in Victorian sitting rooms with Stereoscopic viewers? Is there a mass audience who wants to enjoy ducking flyspecks or Leonopteryx poop flying out at them from the screen in the comfort of their home? 


 A Short History Lesson

Muybridge created a series of 'animal locomotion 'photos using multiple cameras, strobes, and a wire trigger system. If you do not recognize Muybridge, you have been exposed to his work numerous times; most folks have seen 'woman descending stairs'- whether you intended to or not. The 'locomotion studies' showed animals of all species running and jumping; most contained studies of human locomotion. 



Most of the human locomotion photos studied female models in gauzy material. Not surprisingly, Muybridge's lectures were restricted to male audience members only. Thomas Edison later bought a large section of Muybridge's work and equipment and sequestered himself in his Secaucus, NJ lab, where the first motion pictures were soon after 'invented.'

The connection? Pundits of the time gave very little credence to Mr. Edison or Muybridge's creations aside from a passing fancy.





Shady Shades

Of course, 3D has a future; the question is, will it revolutionize the way we watch media at home? Just as with HD and surround sound, the results are stunning when it is done right; when done wrong, it can make you physically ill.


 3D

I do not see 3D becoming the de facto way to present media. Gaming and interactive training concepts work really well, but I still cannot see myself and my friends gathered around the TV wearing silly glasses and jockeying for the 'sweet' spot during a game. Yes, I have seen demos at Infocomm and CEDIA, but the experience is always singular- encased and separated from my fellow viewers by a hunk of hardware on my head. 


Besides, I am more of a Blue-Blockers kinda guy.


 


 

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Pico Projectors and the Perfection of Flesh Tones- A Cautionary tale

You have may well notedthe ads for the cell phones with Pico projectors on television the last couple of weeks.  Now that this these units are in the wild and inescapable, the era of forced viewing has finally arrived.  Even the product ad seems to promote this with a scene where a third co-worker enters a lunch room proclaiming the that everyone must see the latest trailer from Avatar.  Oh, joy now not only must I endure the over-hyped chatter about this movie, I can no longer escape random showings of this or any other video.  To be clear- I think this is a very cool technology but the social ripple of unintended consequences great. 


I already pontificated on this in an earlier post - I reprint it here.


When properly lit and shot on film, this makes for the best test of flesh tones one can find." -TW




It is indeed interesting what one finds whilst trolling manufactures websites – Yeah, I know I need to get out more.


3M has announced a functioning video projector designed to fit into a mobile device (Cell Phone, Blackberry, and Digital Camera).  The 3M site http://www.3m.com/mpro/index.html states the unit is


"Roughly the size of a wireless earpiece, and a half inch thick..."


can project an image of


"VGA 640x480 Resolution"


And - most interestingly or curiously


"Projects sizes 5' to 50' or more"


The 3M description markets this as a social tool for sharing photos and videos; I see the break mobile content providers have been looking for in particular the WiMax folks.  All those arguments against people watching content on their phones because the screen is too small just may have gone away. 


Taking a futurist POV, imagine a time when there are no 103" plasmas just your mobile content device which projects an HD image of up to 60" or 70".  Aside from a central sever for storing your terabytes of content you take it all with you. (that which you could not store on the mobile device could be accessed via a slingbox like connection) oh, and it can make phone calls as well.


While the techie in me gets all worked up about the above being possible and I am intent on finding system diagrams to figure out how this works, the luddite in me bemoans the loss of regionalization. With the advent of cable, Satellite TV and the Slingbox type devices we no longer allow ourselves a chance to see local programming. Often locals do not see local programming - aside from the 6:00 news. Accents are becoming homogenized, Story lines all the same. Instead we arrive at the hotel, set up our PC to connect to the Slingbox and watch all our shows including our local news-(not the local news of the place we are staying). I do have hope that IPTV and sites like YouTube will always provide an outlet for truly regional culture; does anyone know exactly what happened to the Manhattan accent you last saw in 40's movies?


There are a number of troublesome possibilities as well:


·       Those lovely folks who seem to think the rest of us are utterly fascinated with their lives and use their Nextel or speaker phone on trains have a new way to invade personal space.


·       The potential for showing images you would really not rather- or I'd rather not see.


The lure of showing something elicits in a public manner -even if just as a laugh- can be quite strong.


In the days of the first single gun LCD projectors a number of techs-(including me) and a projectionist stayed late putting a new unit through its paces. The company I worked for rented several floors which had windows on two side streets and the main ave. Initially we pointed the projector out one of the open windows facing a block long side street wall to see just how big an image the projector could actually produce.  The image was big and damn bright! As it grew later on an early summers day we became even more impressed as the video engineer tweaked a few things and was able to produce a super bright image of about 20' (remember the throw was just a Manhattan side street width).  The projectionist wondered aloud if this 'data' projector could moonlight as IMAG support - (IMAG commonly is the projected talking head of the on stage speaker).  Someone mentioned that it must be fairly inefficient in handling flesh tones. 


Here is where the title of this entry comes from. Our ever resourceful projectionist placed a tape in the SVO deck and hit play. Up before us leaped to life a 20' super bright image of a couple in flagrante delicto. Yeah, you read that right.  There in full color was a 20' porn playing. We laughed, snickered, and thanked our stars that this was an industrial area after 8 pm on a Tuesday night. Then we heard a Yelp, expletives and our desk phones started to ring.  It appears two senior management types had stayed late as well and were just at that moment crossing the side street when our impromptu show had started.  Suffice it to say, the next few days were a bit tense in the office. Those who know the story, who’s initial are credited to the quote and just why we had ready access to the content will completely understand why I still find it hilarious.


We were some high tech geeks with access to very pricey toys and took a moment to misuse it. It was a one off event unlikely to happen again for some time.  Now anyone with a penchant to cause a ruckus could do nearly the same but all from his \ her mobile device.


Considering the two leading specs quoted above from the 3M site. 


640x480 is just tolerable looking at a 5' image, any bigger and you lose all definition.  I see no way the "..up to and above 50' image" is plausible.



Original Post Link here: http://bit.ly/8O3Zov